Who Should Be Driving in Korea?

South Korea became a super-aged society in 2025. The effects are showing up everywhere, but nowhere more visibly than on the roads.

In this episode, Joe and Shawn talk about the sharp rise in accidents involving elderly drivers, including several deadly incidents in Seoul and beyond. They dig into the numbers, the government’s largely ineffective license return programs, and why simply telling seniors to stop driving ignores deeper issues like poverty, work necessity, and isolation.

This is not a blame episode. It’s about how Korea went from automatic respect for elders to open ageism, and how fear-driven policy risks making the problem worse instead of safer.

       

 

Join our Patreon to get more stuff

https://patreon.com/darksideofseoul

Book a tour of The Dark Side of Seoul Ghost Walk at https://darksideofseoul.com

Credits

Produced by Joe McPherson and Shawn Morrissey

Music by Soraksan

Top Tier Patrons

Angel Earl
Joel Bonomini
Devon Hiphner
Gabi Palomino
Steve Marsh
Eva Sikora
Ron Chang
Hunter Winter
Cecilia Löfgren Dumas
Ashley Wright
Edward Bradford
Boram Yoon
Chad Struhs
Stewart MacMillan
Louise Dreisig

Seniors Behind the Wheel: Korea’s Driving Dilemma

South Korea officially became a super-aged society in 2025. That shift has triggered urgent questions about labor, welfare, and healthcare. But one of the most immediate and visible problems is happening on the streets.

Elderly drivers are involved in more accidents than ever, and the conversation around them has turned sharp, emotional, and often deeply ageist.

Recent Accidents That Shook Public Confidence

Several high-profile crashes have pushed the issue into daily headlines.

In January, a taxi driven by a man in his late seventies jumped a curb near Jonggak Station, killing one pedestrian and injuring fifteen. He was not intoxicated, but had taken cold medicine known to cause drowsiness.

In November 2025, a truck driven by a man in his late sixties plowed through shoppers at Bucheon’s Jeil Market, killing two and injuring nineteen.

In July 2024, another elderly driver went the wrong way near City Hall, mounted a sidewalk, and killed nine pedestrians.

Each incident intensified public anger and fear, often directed at seniors as a group rather than at systemic failures.

What the Numbers Actually Say

According to the Korea Transportation Safety Authority, accidents involving drivers aged 65 and older rose from 31,072 in 2020 to 42,369 in 2024.

Their share of total accidents increased from 14.8 percent to 21.5 percent. Elderly drivers also consistently record the highest fatality rate, more than 40 percent higher than the next age group.

In 2024 alone, 761 people were killed in crashes caused by elderly drivers, roughly 30 percent of all traffic deaths.

Reaction time, cognitive decline, and situational awareness are contributing factors, but they do not exist in isolation.

Why Seniors Keep Driving

The government encourages elderly drivers to voluntarily return their licenses. Seoul offers transportation credits worth 200,000 won to drivers aged 70 and over. Other regions provide taxi vouchers.

The result is a return rate of just over 2 percent since 2020.

The reason is simple. Many seniors cannot afford to stop driving.

Korea’s elderly poverty rate stands at nearly 40 percent, double the OECD average. Many seniors still work in agriculture, delivery, recycling, and informal labor. Vehicles are tools, not luxuries.

Taking away licenses without providing real alternatives risks cutting off livelihoods.

The Rise of Ageism

Korean society has swung hard from Neo-Confucian respect for elders to open suspicion and blame. Seniors are increasingly framed as incompetent, dangerous, and disposable.

Research shows ageism worsens physical and mental health, increases loneliness, and can even shorten life expectancy. Policies built on fear rather than support risk creating new social crises.

Possible Solutions Beyond Blame

Experts suggest following Japan’s lead. Japan introduced stricter safety systems, mandatory vehicle features that prevent sudden acceleration, and conditional licenses.

Other proposals include:
– Annual cognitive screenings instead of three-year cycles
– Conditional licenses for daytime or local-area driving
– Using national health data to assess driving fitness
– Substantial transport subsidies that actually replace driving

The goal is not punishment. It is risk reduction without abandoning people who still need to survive.

A Problem With No Simple Answer

Korea’s elderly driving issue sits at the intersection of safety, poverty, dignity, and demographic reality.

Taking away keys is easy. Building a system that protects everyone without deepening inequality is much harder.

That is the road Korea is now on.