The Literati Purge of 1519 (Joseon’s Fall, part 3)

Literati Purge of 1519

Hypothesis: the roots of Korean politics’ extremism were sown with this event. Be warned there is a big rant about fundamentalism in world ideologies and religions near the end.

Join our Patreon to get more stuff

https://patreon.com/darksideofseoul

Book a tour of The Dark Side of Seoul Ghost Walk at https://darksideofseoul.com

Listener Mail! Send us a message (Instagram, Facebook, email) and we might read it on air.

Credits

Produced by Joe McPherson, Shawn Morrissey, and Mia Roncati

Music by Soraksan

Top tier Patrons

Angel Earl
Joel Bonomini
Shaaron Cullen
Devon Hiphner
Minseok Lee
Alix Radilla
Ryan Berkebile
Gabi Palomino
Steve Marsh
Chad Struhs
Mitchy Brewer
Sarah Ford
Toni A
Sean 진헌 Braun
Laura Casey

Literati Purge of 1519: The Roots of Korean Political Extremism | Joseon’s Fall, Part 3

In this episode of Joseon’s Fall, we dive deep into one of the most pivotal events in Korean history: the Literati Purge of 1519, also known as the Gimyo Sahwa (기묘사화). This political purge, fueled by internal rivalries and factional struggles, played a significant role in shaping the future of Joseon Korea, sowing the seeds for the extreme factionalism that would plague the country for centuries.

Background: A Legacy of Intrigue and Strife

The political climate of Joseon during the early 1500s was volatile. Following the reign of King Seongjong, which was marked by intrigue, jealousy, and power struggles, King Jungjong ascended to the throne in a tumultuous period. His rise was directly tied to the downfall of Yeonsangun, who was ousted by the Merit-Subject faction after his oppressive reign. Yet, despite the end of Yeonsangun’s rule, Joseon was far from politically stable.

Jo Gwangjo: The Reformist Figure

Enter Jo Gwangjo, a talented and ambitious official who sought to reform Joseon’s political structure by adhering to Confucian ideals. He became one of the most influential figures in Joseon, advocating for reform that would reduce corruption and redistribute power. His efforts to empower the Sarim faction (the scholar officials) were a direct challenge to the entrenched Hungu faction, a powerful group that had dominated the court for years.

Jo Gwangjo’s reforms included policies that sought to promote equality, limit the landholdings of the wealthy, and offer government positions to talented individuals—regardless of their social background, even extending opportunities to slaves. These ideals clashed with the conservative elements in the court, who feared that Jo’s rise threatened their established privileges.

The Extremes of Political Purge: The Gimyo Sahwa

The tension between reform and conservatism came to a head in 1519, with the Gimyo Sahwa, a purge that would eliminate reformists like Jo Gwangjo from the political scene. At the heart of the purge were Jo’s efforts to dismantle the old power structure, which included the elite Merit-Subject officials who had supported the coup that placed King Jungjong on the throne.

Jo’s self-righteous pursuit of reform and his refusal to compromise created enemies on all sides. As he expanded his influence, pushing for policies that antagonized the entrenched factions, Jo also made powerful enemies within the Merit-Subject faction, notably Hong Gyeongju, Sim Jeong, and Nam Gon, who had personal grudges against him. They believed Jo’s reforms threatened not just their power but the very structure of Joseon society.

The Hungu faction—led by King Jungjong’s concubines and their allies—saw Jo as a potential threat to the stability of the throne. As Jo pushed further with his reforms, accusations of treason mounted. By the fall of 1519, the Hungu faction had mobilized to eliminate Jo and his reformist allies.

The Trial and Execution of Jo Gwangjo

In November 1519, the Hungu faction moved quickly to neutralize Jo. King Jungjong, already weary of Jo’s persistent reforms and frustrated with his self-righteousness, ordered Jo’s arrest. His charges were based on fabricated evidence, including allegations that Jo was plotting to make himself king.

At this point, a crucial turning point arrived when Yi Jang-gon, the War Minister, intervened to ensure due process was followed. However, the tide had already turned. Jo was accused of high treason, and his reforms were cast as dangerous to the kingdom’s stability. Despite protests from scholar-officials and students—who rallied in Jo’s defense—he was convicted and exiled to Neung-ju.

Months later, under mounting pressure, King Jungjong reversed his decision and reinstated Jo’s death sentence. On February 10, 1520, Jo Gwangjo drank poison, marking a tragic end to his reformist vision. His death was followed by political chaos that laid the groundwork for the factionalism that would haunt Joseon politics for centuries.

Aftermath: The Return of the Hungu Faction

The Literati Purge of 1519 devastated the Sarim faction, and the reforms Jo had worked for were swiftly undone. The Merit-Subject faction reversed many of the policies, including the special examination system Jo had implemented. The Hungu faction regained its foothold, solidifying its influence in the court and weakening any potential reforms that might have led Joseon to a more equal and just society.

The execution of Jo Gwangjo became a symbol of the ruthlessness of political infighting. Those who were swept up in the purge—many of them reform-minded scholar-officials—were executed, exiled, or banished. The political strife of this period would become a defining characteristic of Joseon’s governance, as the ruling elite increasingly resorted to dirty tricks and purges to maintain their power.

The Legacy of the Literati Purge: The Roots of Korean Political Extremism

The Literati Purge of 1519 can be seen as the beginning of Korea’s political extremism, where self-righteousness and the unwillingness to compromise gave birth to a culture of factionalism that would define Korean politics for centuries. Jo Gwangjo’s zeal for reform, while rooted in Confucian values, ultimately led to his downfall because he could not temper his ambitions with the realities of court politics.

This event also reflects a broader global pattern seen in fundamentalist ideologies—whether in religion, politics, or society—where those in power refuse to compromise and view their cause as the absolute truth. Neo-Confucianism, which sought to enforce moral order and righteousness, ultimately became dogmatic in Joseon, mirroring the rise of fundamentalism in other cultures. Jo’s death was not just the loss of a reformer but the tragic end to a moment in history when moderation and balance could have brought about profound change.

As Yi I, the renowned Confucian scholar, observed, Jo’s political failure was not just a consequence of his political immaturity, but a direct result of his haste in pursuing reforms without understanding the nuances of the power structures he sought to alter.

Conclusion: A Missed Opportunity for Joseon

The Literati Purge of 1519 represented a missed opportunity for Joseon. It set the stage for extremism in politics, where inflexibility, self-righteousness, and factionalism would continue to plague the court for generations. It was a precursor to the political strife that would ultimately lead to the fall of Joseon—a dynasty torn apart by its own internal contradictions and a system that valued personal loyalty over national unity.

In this chapter of Joseon’s Fall, we see how power struggles within the royal court and the destructive nature of factionalism led to the destruction of reform and the birth of a deeply entrenched political system. Stay tuned for more as we continue our journey through the turbulent history of Joseon Korea.


Key Takeaways:

  • Jo Gwangjo’s Political Reforms: His idealistic reforms were opposed by the ruling elite, leading to his eventual downfall.
  • The Purge and Its Aftermath: The Literati Purge of 1519 marked a decisive moment in Joseon’s history, ensuring the return of the conservative Hungu faction.
  • Roots of Political Extremism: The events of 1519 set the stage for factionalism that would dominate Joseon politics for centuries.
  • Legacy of Failure: Jo Gwangjo’s rise and fall serve as a cautionary tale for future generations about the dangers of political idealism without compromise.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.