Category: Fun Size

  • Korea’s Flashing Problem

    Korea’s Flashing Problem

    Apple Podcasts  Spotify Audible Stitcher   Buzzsprout   RSS

     

    Join our Patreon to get more stuff

    https://patreon.com/darksideofseoul

    Book a tour of The Dark Side of Seoul Ghost Walk at https://darksideofseoul.com

    Credits

    Produced by Joe McPherson and Shawn Morrissey

    Music by Soraksan

    Top Tier Patrons

    Angel Earl
    Joel Bonomini
    Devon Hiphner
    Gabi Palomino
    Steve Marsh
    Eva Sikora
    Ron Chang
    Hunter Winter
    Cecilia Löfgren Dumas
    Ashley Wright
    Edward Bradford
    Boram Yoon
    Chad Struhs
    Stewart MacMillan
    Louise Dreisig

    Korea’s Strange and Growing Flashing Problem

    South Korea has had problems with flashing and public indecency for decades. The academic research on the issue goes back at least to the late 2000s, and honestly, probably much earlier than that. Yet despite years of concern, the incidents continue to happen with uncomfortable regularity.

    In Korean media, flashers are often called “Burberry Men,” a nickname referencing the stereotypical image of a man in a trench coat exposing himself in public. It is one of those weird euphemisms that sounds almost comedic until you stop and think about what the crimes actually involve.

    Because most victims are women and children.

    And the recent cases are not exactly reassuring.

    The Cases Keep Happening

    One of the stranger serial cases happened in Asan between late 2022 and spring 2025. A man in his twenties committed nearly twenty offenses over that period. In one incident at a university, he set up a mobile phone near the entrance to a male washroom, then stepped into the hallway and exposed himself when women walked past. The phone captured both his body and the reactions of the victims.

    That level of planning makes the whole thing feel even creepier.

    In Seoul’s Jungnang-gu district throughout 2025, another offender repeatedly targeted elementary school girls. Similar incidents happened in Ulsan near apartment complexes. In many of these cases, the locations are depressingly predictable: around schools, parks, bus stops, train stations, elevators, and quiet residential areas.

    Basically places where people should feel safe.

    Then there are the public masturbation cases, which somehow make things even worse. Earlier this year in Cheongju, an elderly man approached women in a park and masturbated in front of them. A similar incident happened in Jeonju not long after.

    If you talk to women who have lived in Seoul or Gyeonggi for a long time, you will hear stories about this sort of thing happening on buses and trains as well. It is one of those topics that men often underestimate simply because they rarely experience it themselves.

    The Infamous Prosecutor Case

    One of the most infamous public indecency scandals in Korea happened in 2014.

    Kim Soo-chang, the chief prosecutor of Jeju, was caught publicly masturbating near a restaurant. The investigation later revealed he had done it multiple times. The scandal exploded because this was not some random drunk guy. This was one of the country’s top legal officials.

    You would think the punishment would be severe.

    Instead, the indictment was eventually dropped after he was ordered to undergo psychiatric treatment.

    That outcome still frustrates many people today because it reinforced the perception that powerful people in Korea often escape serious consequences.

    Why Does This Happen?

    Psychologists generally classify flashing under exhibitionism or other paraphilic disorders. Research often links compulsive sexual exposure behavior to childhood trauma, abuse, or early sexualization.

    That does not excuse the behavior, obviously. But it helps explain why some offenders repeat these crimes over and over despite the social and legal risks.

    One disturbing detail is that many incidents involve children as targets. That raises the stakes enormously because the psychological effects on victims can last for years.

    And Korea has already been dealing with broader concerns about crimes involving minors. Previous episodes of this podcast have touched on rising fears surrounding child safety and attempted kidnappings.

    The Punishments Feel Weak

    Under Korean law, flashing usually falls under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment of Sexual Crimes. If children are involved, additional charges can apply.

    Still, the punishments often feel surprisingly light.

    Convictions commonly result in around a year in prison or fines of roughly five million won. Many people feel that is nowhere near enough, especially for repeat offenders.

    There have also been growing discussions about mandatory psychological treatment and restrictions on where convicted offenders can go.

    Because right now, the system often feels reactive rather than preventative.

    Even North Korea Has Cases

    Oddly enough, even North Korea is not immune from this problem.

    In 2023, reports emerged that two elementary school girls were flashed while walking early in the morning to clean statues of the Kim family. The details are limited, but the story stood out because even in one of the most tightly controlled societies on Earth, this sort of behavior still exists.

    Human behavior, unfortunately, does not disappear just because a government tries to control everything else.

    A Problem Korea Still Hasn’t Solved

    Back in 2014, one Korean report warned that public indecency incidents would likely increase in the future.

    And here we are.

    Korea has excellent CCTV coverage, harsh public shame culture, and increasingly sophisticated policing technology. Yet these incidents continue happening. That suggests the issue runs deeper than simply catching offenders after the fact.

    It is a social problem, a psychological problem, and in some cases a legal problem.

    And like a lot of uncomfortable social issues in Korea, people often seem more comfortable joking about it than confronting it directly.

  • Why Teachers in Korea Can’t Take Sick Days

    Why Teachers in Korea Can’t Take Sick Days

    Apple Podcasts  Spotify Audible Stitcher   Buzzsprout   RSS

     

    Join our Patreon to get more stuff

    https://patreon.com/darksideofseoul

    Book a tour of The Dark Side of Seoul Ghost Walk at https://darksideofseoul.com

    Credits

    Produced by Joe McPherson and Shawn Morrissey

    Music by Soraksan

    Top Tier Patrons

    Angel Earl
    Joel Bonomini
    Devon Hiphner
    Gabi Palomino
    Steve Marsh
    Eva Sikora
    Ron Chang
    Hunter Winter
    Cecilia Löfgren Dumas
    Ashley Wright
    Edward Bradford
    Boram Yoon
    Chad Struhs
    Stewart MacMillan
    Louise Dreisig

    Why teachers in Korea can't take sick days, Korean woman sneezing

    Why Taking a Sick Day in Korea Isn’t That Simple

    On paper, sick leave in Korea is straightforward. Employees are legally entitled to take time off when they’re unwell.

    In practice, it’s much more complicated.

    Sick Leave Exists… But It’s Not Used

    Many workers, especially in education, feel pressure not to take sick days.

    The reasons are both cultural and structural. Even though the law allows it, the workplace environment often discourages it. Teachers, in particular, are expected to keep working unless absolutely necessary.

    That creates a gap between what the law says and what actually happens.

    The Substitute Teacher Problem

    In many private kindergartens, the system for substitute teachers barely functions.

    If a teacher needs time off:

    • They may have to find their own replacement
    • They may have to pay for that replacement themselves
    • In some cases, there is no replacement available

    In those situations, teachers often choose to work while sick rather than deal with the disruption.

    Even when support systems exist, they are inconsistent. Out of 17 regional education offices, only a handful provide meaningful financial support for substitute teachers.

    Cultural Pressure to Keep Working

    There is also a strong social expectation to keep going, even when unwell.

    Some teachers feel the need to apologize for taking time off by buying drinks or gifts for coworkers. Others worry about how they will be perceived by employers or parents.

    The result is a system where people feel obligated to work through illness.

    When the System Fails

    A recent case brought national attention to this issue.

    A kindergarten teacher in Bucheon was diagnosed with the flu and advised to rest. Instead, she continued working under pressure for several days.

    Her condition worsened. She was eventually admitted to intensive care and passed away two weeks later.

    Cases like this highlight how the gap between policy and reality can have serious consequences.

    Calls for Change

    There are now growing calls to reform the system.

    One proposal is to require teachers to take sick leave when diagnosed with infectious illnesses, both for their own health and to protect students.

    The Ministry of Education has begun reviewing the issue, and unions are pushing for stronger protections.

    A System That Needs Fixing

    Sick leave in Korea is not just a legal issue. It’s a cultural and structural one.

    Until the systems around it improve, many workers will continue to face the same dilemma: take a day off and deal with the consequences, or keep working and risk their health.

  • Fun size: The Gwanghwamun Gate Controversy

    Fun size: The Gwanghwamun Gate Controversy

    Apple Podcasts  Spotify Audible Stitcher   Buzzsprout   RSS

     

    Join our Patreon to get more stuff

    https://patreon.com/darksideofseoul

    Book a tour of The Dark Side of Seoul Ghost Walk at https://darksideofseoul.com

    Credits

    Produced by Joe McPherson and Shawn Morrissey

    Music by Soraksan

    Top Tier Patrons

    Angel Earl
    Joel Bonomini
    Devon Hiphner
    Gabi Palomino
    Steve Marsh
    Eva Sikora
    Ron Chang
    Hunter Winter
    Cecilia Löfgren Dumas
    Ashley Wright
    Edward Bradford
    Boram Yoon
    Chad Struhs
    Stewart MacMillan
    Louise Dreisig

    The Gwanghwamun Sign Controversy. A picture of Gwanghwamun Gate with both Hanja and Hangul signs on it in Seoul, South Korea.

    The Gwanghwamun Sign Debate: Hangul vs Hanja

    Korea’s most famous gate is once again at the center of a familiar debate.

    The question sounds simple: should the sign at Gwanghwamun be written in Hangul or Hanja? But behind that choice is a deeper conversation about history, identity, and how Korea presents itself to the world.

    Why Gwanghwamun Used Hanja

    For most of Korean history, written language relied on Chinese characters. Even after Hangul was created in the 15th century, Hanja remained dominant in official settings for centuries.

    Important locations like Gwanghwamun used Hanja not just for practicality, but because it reflected Korea’s place within a broader East Asian cultural sphere.

    The Role of Hangul Today

    Hangul is now Korea’s primary writing system and a central part of national identity.

    It is easier to read, more accessible, and better suited for modern Korean. For many people, using Hangul on major landmarks represents independence and clarity.

    At the same time, replacing Hanja entirely raises questions about how much of the past should be preserved.

    Why This Debate Keeps Coming Back

    The Gwanghwamun sign has changed before. During the Park Chung-hee era, a Hangul version was used, showing that this isn’t a new issue.

    Recently, the topic resurfaced after renewed public attention, possibly influenced by global interest in Korean culture.

    That raises another question: are these decisions being driven by cultural values, or by modern branding?

    A Question of Consistency

    One of the biggest concerns is consistency.

    If Korea moves toward Hangul for historical sites, should that apply everywhere? Selective changes can feel less like a principle and more like a temporary trend.

    More Than Just a Sign

    In the end, this debate isn’t just about language.

    It’s about how Korea balances its history with its present identity. Hanja connects Korea to its past, while Hangul represents its modern voice.

    The tension between the two is likely to continue—because both are still part of the story.